Money in Politics: The Root of Our Political Dumpster Fire

Ive been thinking about whats wrong with our political system. When people ask me how to fix the absolute dumpster fire were currently living through – I usually admit I dont have an answer. But recently I had a revelation: we need to stop focusing on individual issues and tackle the root cause – money in politics.

Heres the brutal truth – our government is broken because weve allowed money to be its focal point. But the solution isnt complicated or even radical.

The data is staggering. For the 2024 election cycle alone, candidates and their supporting groups raised over .8 billion by August 2024. When lawmakers spend 3-4 hours daily dialing for dollars – sometimes 6-8 hours during election season – something fundamental is broken. Politicians have essentially become telemarketers with a side gig making laws.

According to reports, typical House members in competitive districts raise about ,500 per day – thats roughly .4 million per year just to keep their jobs. Senators in tight races? Theyre raising over ,000 daily. The burden is crushing – and it prevents them from doing what we actually elected them to do.

And Citizens United only made this nightmare worse.

In 2010, the Supreme Court opened the floodgates to unlimited corporate money in politics. Now billionaires and special interests can dump endless cash into elections – not directly to candidates but through super PACs and dark money groups. This shit has fundamentally corrupted our system.

Term limits would break this cycle. If legislators knew their time was limited – they’d focus more on accomplishing something rather than just pleasing donors for the next election. The status quo works great for incumbents who enjoy a 95% reelection rate despite Congress having approval ratings below 20%.

Research shows term-limited lawmakers are more likely to tackle difficult issues since they don’t fear electoral consequences. They might actually address our trillion national debt instead of kicking it down the road. And we’d get fresh blood with real-world experience rather than career politicians who’ve forgotten what normal life looks like.

But here’s the problem – Congress will never voluntarily limit their own power. The same people benefiting from the current system won’t vote to end it. That’s where a nationwide strike comes in.

Labor strikes have reshaped American society before. The early 20th century saw massive actions that gave us the 40-hour workweek and basic worker protections. The 1945-46 strike wave involved 5 million workers – the largest in US history – and forced major economic changes.

Imagine if we all refused to work until Congress passed a constitutional amendment limiting their terms. The economy would grind to a halt. Supply chains would collapse. The pressure would be overwhelming.

Critics will say term limits wouldn’t solve everything. They’ll claim we’d lose institutional knowledge and empower lobbyists who’d outlast the representatives. But these arguments defend a broken status quo. The current system clearly isn’t working – so claiming term limits might create problems is like worrying about water damage while your house burns down.

Overturning Citizens United would be the ultimate goal – returning sanity to campaign finance. But term limits are the first step toward breaking the stranglehold of money in politics.

Let’s be real – it wouldnt be easy. Strikes require solidarity and sacrifice. But what’s the alternative? Watching our democracy die slowly as billionaires and corporations buy more influence while regular people get squeezed?

Look – dont get me wrong – I dont look forward to having a recession, job losses, retirement accounts being wiped out, and all of the other dystopian projections – but if those things do come to pass – we need to have a real plan ready. Ive been backing a nationwide strike since Trump took office. If we get there – we need to know what we want and 72% of Americans already agree there should be term limits for Congress. Its not that wild of an ask. If you fail to plan, you plan to fail