What are Drop Off Votes And Why Do They Point to Vote Manipulation?

Let’s talk about drop-off voting – a pattern that broke all the rules in 2024.

Sometimes, the way ballots are cast and counted reveals patterns that don’t add up. One of those patterns is drop-off voting. The term isn’t official election jargon, but it describes something very real – the difference between the number of votes cast for president versus those cast for down-ballot races like Senate or House. In other words, it is a measure of how many voters bother to fill out the entire ballot versus stopping at the top. Normally, this follows predictable patterns.

But it didn’t in 2024.

What makes this interesting is how drop-off voting is skewed in ways that don’t follow historical trends. When that happens, it raises questions about voter behavior, election integrity, or whether something shady was going on.

In 2024, the numbers went sideways. Drop-off rates tend to be fairly predictable, with small shifts based on how competitive races are, how much attention candidates get, and state-specific voting laws. But in 2024, the drop-off didn’t follow the usual script. Republican drop-off hit 10 percent in swing states, meaning one in ten Trump voters skipped Senate or House races. Meanwhile, Democrats showed a minimal drop-off—sometimes a negative drop-off, with more votes for Senate candidates than for Harris. That means people filled out their ballot for a Democratic Senator – but didn’t vote for anyone as president.

That’s really bizarre, right?

SMART Elections analyzed data from states like Arizona, North Carolina, and Ohio, highlighting major discrepancies between presidential and Senate votes. Either voters suddenly decided to become highly selective, or something about the way votes were recorded or counted was off.

State Laws and Policies

Election laws certainly played a role in how people voted, and there were plenty of big changes that impacted participation:

Florida reduced the number of ballot drop boxes and restricted where they could be placed, making them less accessible.
Ohio implemented stricter voter ID laws and changed how ballots were processed, which the Brennan Center for Justice warned could depress turnout.
Pennsylvania and California allowed drop boxes but enforced strict deadlines that made voting harder for some people.

Election security was the justification, but critics argued that these measures disproportionately affected Democratic-leaning voters. That should have meant Democrats would show higher drop-off rates, but that’s not what happened. Instead, Republicans saw a higher drop-off. If voter suppression were the main factor, both parties should have seen similar trends. They didn’t.

Make it make sense.

Impact on Election Outcomes

Drop-off voting can shift power in Congress and state legislatures. In 2024, the Seattle Times pointed to lower-than-expected Democratic turnout as a factor in Kamala Harris’s loss. Yet, in some states, down-ballot Democrats performed better than their own party’s presidential candidate. That makes no sense in a hyper-partisan election.

This kind of split-ticket voting happens occasionally, but not at this scale. The idea that large numbers of voters backed Trump for president but then turned around and voted for Democratic Governors or Senators in the same states doesn’t align with past elections. Either voter ideology shifted in a way that no pollster saw coming and makes very little sense, or something else was at play.

Drop Off Voting and Signs of Manipulation

Anomalies in Voting Patterns

Major drop-off discrepancies are red flags. When a presidential candidate gets significantly more votes than their party’s Senate or House candidate in the same state, something is off. Why would anyone take the time to vote for a Republican president but skip voting for the other Republicans on the ticket? If these patterns were spread evenly across both parties, that would be one thing, but that’s not what happened.

If similar states with similar political leanings but different voting laws show different drop-off rates, that suggests localized interference.

If one candidate receives way more votes than their party’s down-ballot candidates, it raises the question of ballot stuffing, where fraudulent votes are added to inflate the numbers for a single race.

Cybersecurity and Election Integrity

The stakes in 2024 were high, and election security was a major concern. Reports pointed to:

Increased cyber threats targeting voter databases and election systems.
Electronic voting glitches where down-ballot votes weren’t recorded correctly.
Ballot harvesting issues where mass collection of ballots led to selective submission.

Why This Matters

Drop-off voting isn’t just a technical statistic – it is a signal. When patterns don’t align with past elections, it means something changed. The question is, what? Voter behavior? New laws? Or something more deliberate?

Some drop-offs are normal. But when the numbers defy logic, they demand scrutiny. Did voters suddenly change their habits, or were external forces at play? If the answer isn’t obvious, then it is worth taking a closer look at how votes were cast, counted, and reported. Until those questions are answered, the drop-off voting patterns of 2024 remain a red flag in an election that was already under the microscope.